NFT Platform Origin Protocol’s Proposals to Reduce Transaction Costs and Increase Pledge Rewards: How They Impact Token Economics
On March 21, the NFT platform Origin Protocol recently approved a proposal to reduce the transaction cost of Origin Store in the local trading market to 0% by June 1, 2023 (previou
On March 21, the NFT platform Origin Protocol recently approved a proposal to reduce the transaction cost of Origin Store in the local trading market to 0% by June 1, 2023 (previously 1.25%), and is voting on the proposal to “increase the pledge reward for OGN pledge”. These two proposals may rebalance their token economics as they attempt to compete in a zero fee royalty war without excluding OGN token pledgers, who rely on the platform’s now drastically reduced fee revenues.
Origin Protocol considers adding OGN pledge rewards after joining NFT royalty competition
Origin Protocol, a decentralized platform that enables the creation of peer-to-peer marketplaces and e-commerce applications, has recently approved two proposals that could significantly impact its token economics as it competes in the zero-fee royalty market. On March 21, the platform approved a proposal to reduce the transaction cost of Origin Store in the local trading market to 0% by June 1, 2023 (previously 1.25%). Additionally, they are voting on the proposal to increase the pledge reward for OGN pledge. This article explores the implications of these changes and the impact they may have on the platform’s users and stakeholders.
Reducing Transaction Costs to 0% by June 1, 2023
The reduction of transaction costs is a significant move by Origin Protocol, particularly as it seeks to compete in the zero-fee royalty market. However, the downside of a zero-fee structure is that those who rely on fee revenues to fund their business model are left in a precarious position. This is where Origin Protocol’s reduced fee revenues will affect token economics, potentially impacting the overall value of the OGN token.
As a decentralized platform, Origin Protocol operates on an underlying infrastructure that runs on the Ethereum blockchain. For every transaction made, users are required to pay a network fee in Ether (ETH). This network fee is used to pay the miners who maintain the security and stability of the blockchain network. Origin Protocol has historically charged a 1.25% transaction fee on its Origin Store transactions, effectively subsidizing its users’ Ethereum network fees.
The reduction of these fees could have a number of implications for the platform. Firstly, it could make it more attractive for users to start selling NFTs on Origin Protocol instead of other platforms that charge higher fees, such as OpenSea. Furthermore, it could incentivize users to hold onto their OGN tokens rather than selling them on secondary markets as they wait for the pledge reward to increase. However, it remains to be seen how the reduction of transaction fees will impact those who have pledged OGN tokens to the platform and rely on the revenue generated from transaction fees.
Increasing Pledge Rewards
The second proposal aims to increase the pledge reward for OGN pledge, which could help rebalance the platform’s token economics. The OGN pledge program incentivizes users to hold OGN tokens in return for reduced transaction costs over time. This program rewards users who pledge their tokens for extended periods, corresponding to an increasing reduction in fees.
Currently, there are over 170 million OGN tokens pledged on the platform, equating to almost 20% of the total circulating supply. While the OGN pledge program has been successful in incentivizing users to hold onto their tokens, the reduction in transaction fees potentially puts this in jeopardy. Thus, the increase in pledge rewards could help maintain the program’s success despite the drop in fee revenues.
The proposal to increase pledge rewards comes in response to the new structure of transaction fees on the platform, which could diminish its revenue streams from fees. The platform aims to maintain the overall value of the OGN token, ensuring that those who hold onto it are rewarded for their loyalty and commitment to the platform.
Conclusion
In summary, the proposals put forward by Origin Protocol could significantly impact the platform’s token economics as it moves to compete in the zero-fee royalty market. The reduction of transaction costs could attract more users to the platform, but it may also impact those who rely on fee revenues to maintain their business model, including those with OGN token pledges. The increase in pledge rewards could help balance the changes brought by the platform’s new fee structure, incentivizing users to continue pledging their OGN tokens. This will help maintain the value and sustainability of the platform as it moves forward.
FAQs
1. How will the reduction in transaction fees impact Origin Protocol’s revenue streams?
The reduction in transaction fees could significantly impact Origin Protocol’s revenue streams, which might impact its business model. While it might result in an increase in platform users, it could also mean that those who depend on fee revenues to maintain their business model (such as those with OGN token pledges) will be disproportionately affected.
2. Why is the increase in pledge rewards necessary to balance the changes brought by the platform’s new fee structure?
The increase in pledge rewards could help maintain the success of the OGN pledge program despite the drop in fee revenues. This will help maintain the value and sustainability of the platform in the long term.
3. How will these changes ultimately impact Origin Protocol’s competitive position in the zero-fee royalty market?
While the changes could make the platform more attractive to users due to lower transaction fees, they could also impact those with OGN token pledges. As such, it remains to be seen how the overall value and sustainability of the platform will be impacted in the long run.
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent qiAiAi's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.qiaiai.com/ai/10456.html
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.
Related recommendations
-
Archway Hackathon: A Bounty Hunt for DAO, Infra/Tooling, NFT, and DeFi
On March 15th, according to official news, the Archway Hackathon – Release Your Inner Bull event application portal has been opened on the developer incentive platform DoraHacks.io. Hosted by Archway, this event features four tracks: DAO, Infra/Tooling, NFT, and DeFi, with a total funding of 1000000 ARCH. Before April 24th, entries can be submitted through the Dorahacks.io platform. Archway Hacks.io officially opens at DoraHacks.io Analysis based on this information:The Archway Hackathon, an event that is aimed at fostering innovation and creativity among developers, officially opened its application portal on the developer incentive platform DoraHacks.io on March 15th, 2021. The event, which is being hosted by Archway, features four tracks: DAO, Infra/Tooling, NFT, and DeFi, with a total funding of 1000000 ARCH up for grabs. The Archway Hackathon offers developers an opportunity to showcase their skills and insights in the emerging fields of DAO, Infra/Tooling, NFT, and DeFi. The bounty hunt calls for developers, whether they are beginners or experts in…
-
What Currency to Use for Trading on Huobi Exchange
What currency to use for trading on Huobi Exchange? According to the official an
-
ETH destruction post EIP-1559 implementation: Understanding the impact on the ETH market
According to reports, according to data from Ultrasound. Money, since the implementation of EIP-1559 in August last year, the total destruction amount of ETH has exceeded 3 million
-
Blockchain Analysis Platform Dune Set to Discontinue SparkSQL and PostgreSQL
On April 21st, it was announced that the blockchain analysis platform Dune has released a schedule for the discontinuation of SparkSQL and PostgreSQL. It will be removed from the d
-
Financial Agencies’ Cooperation Over Bank of Silicon Valley
21:00-7:00 Key words: CFTC, Federal Reserve, U.S. Department of Justice, Bank of Silicon Valley Overview of important developments overnight on March 14 Analysis based on this information:The message conveyed in the given keywords might spell trouble for Bank of Silicon Valley, as three major financial agencies, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the Federal Reserve, and the U.S. Department of Justice, are potentially working together against the institution. The timeframe of concern, from 21:00 to 7:00, could indicate that these agencies have been building their case by working late hours. The CFTC is responsible for regulating the derivatives market in the United States. Given the bank’s significant presence in the tech hub of Silicon Valley, it’s possible that Bank of Silicon Valley has been engaged in derivatives trading or other financial dealings that fall under CFTC’s purview. The two other agencies, the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Department of Justice, are responsible for overseeing monetary policy and enforcing compliance with…
-
Dune Unleashes Its Blockchain Data Analysis Platform With Free Dune API Access for All
On April 25th, the blockchain data analysis platform Dune announced that the Dune API is open to all users and will provide more features for free users. Dune also modified the sub
-
An Introduction to ZkSync and its Rapidly Growing Userbase
According to reports, according to the latest data from Dune Analytics, the number of bridging users has increased after zkSync announced that its main network \”zkSync Era\” will be
-
Why is the wallet on the platform called Cold Wallet (which platform charges cheaper for Cold Wallet)
Why are wallets on platforms called cold wallets? Why are wallets on platforms called cold wallets? With the rise of Bitcoin prices and the rise of decentralized financial (DeFi) ecosystems, many investors have become interested in decentralized digital currencies. But in traditional finance, we need to use a safe method to ensure the safety of our assets. And this method is mainly used in some high-risk investment projects, such as short selling, investment funds, private equity funds, and exchanges; In addition, some people may use such tools for illegal fundraising and fraud Due to the characteristics of blockchain technology, users must undergo strict screening to obtain the corresponding funds or information flow when participating in any project or service, in order to avoid hacker attacks and fraudulent behavior. Therefore, why are wallets on the platform called cold wallets? According to the 2018 Global Crypto Asset Report released by the international third-party Big data rating agency RatingToken, the global market value…
-
Finoa secures three license approvals from German Financial Regulator
On February 28, it was reported that the encryption custodian Finoa had obtained three license approvals from the German financial regulator BaFin, including t…
-
Coinbase Enables ETH Release Function: What This Means for Investors
According to reports, according to official Twitter, Coinbase announced that it has enabled ETH to release its pledge function.
Coinbase has enabled ETH pledge release function
As