The Unfortunate Loss of CryptoPunk #685 due to NFT Wrapping Error
On March 25th, NFT collector Brandon Riley added CryptoPunk # 685 to his collection by paying 77 ETH on March 13th, hoping to hold it for a long time. During the unfamiliar process
On March 25th, NFT collector Brandon Riley added CryptoPunk # 685 to his collection by paying 77 ETH on March 13th, hoping to hold it for a long time. During the unfamiliar process of wrapping NFT, Riley accidentally sent the asset to the destruction address and permanently deleted the NFT from circulation. （Cointelegraph）
CryptoPunk # 685 was mistakenly sent to the destruction address
On March 25th, NFT collector Brandon Riley added CryptoPunk # 685 to his collection, hoping to hold it for a long time. However, during the unfamiliar process of wrapping NFT, Riley accidentally sent the asset to the destruction address, thereby permanently deleting the NFT from circulation. The incident has garnered significant attention among the crypto community and highlighted the importance of proper NFT wrapping procedures to avoid such mistakes.
What is NFT Wrapping?
Non-Fungible Tokens(NFTs) have taken the digital world by storm, revolutionizing the way individuals can buy, sell, and trade digitized assets. NFT wrapping is the process by which NFTs are transformed and secured to run on a standard blockchain. It involves the conversion of the ERC-721 token into the ERC-20 token, allowing it to function seamlessly on other platforms, such as Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs) without losing any of its data integrity.
The Importance of Proper NFT Wrapping
The unfortunate loss of CryptoPunk #685 because of mismanaged NFT wrapping highlights the importance of following proper NFT wrapping procedures to avoid such errors. NFT wrapping involves several distinct steps that can be complicated and require a thorough understanding of the process. Thus, it is critical to follow these procedures meticulously to avoid costly errors.
What Happened to CryptoPunk #685?
Brandon Riley accidentally sent the asset to the destruction address while attempting to wrap his CryptoPunk #685. This small mistake led to a significant loss as the NFT was permanently lost from circulation. The destruction address is a black-hole address that no one can access, rendering any assets sent into it unsalvageable, even for the smartest of cryptographers.
Learning from the Past
The loss of valuable NFT assets due to avoidable errors is not uncommon; the infamous story of James Howells, who threw away a hard drive containing 7,500 Bitcoin, is still fresh in people’s minds. The cryptocurrency industry is still in its infancy, and individuals need to take extra precautions to mitigate the risks of losing their digital assets. Proper protocols should be followed when handling and managing cryptocurrencies and NFTs, with meticulous attention paid to the wrapping procedure. This loss serves as an unfortunate lesson to the community, emphasizing the importance of being vigilant while handling digital assets.
Conclusion
The loss of CryptoPunk #685 is an unfortunate incident that highlights the importance of following proper NFT wrapping procedures to avoid costly mistakes. The incident serves as a warning to the community that precautions are necessary while handling digital assets. Beginners should take extra care while wrapping their NFTs and follow the process meticulously to avoid costly errors. This loss serves as an unfortunate reminder that mistakes, no matter how small, can have significant consequences when handling digital assets.
FAQs
**Q1**: What is NFT wrapping?
**A1**: NFT wrapping is the process by which NFTs are converted from the ERC-721 token to the ERC-20 token, making them function seamlessly on other platforms.
**Q2**: What is the destruction address?
**A2**: The destruction address is a black-hole address that permanently deletes assets sent to it, rendering them unsalvageable.
**Q3**: What can we learn from the loss of CryptoPunk #685?
**A3**: The incident serves as a warning to the community of the importance of handling digital assets carefully, with proper protocols followed to avoid avoidable mistakes.
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent qiAiAi's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.qiaiai.com/crypto/11895.html
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.
Related recommendations
-
What are the advantages of HT (good prospects)?
What are the advantages of HT? Specifically, what are they? HT\’s operation is di
-
Cryptocurrency Adoption in India: A Growing Trend Amongst the Middle Class
On March 21st, it was reported that in the past six years, despite the government\’s traditionally negative attitude towards the industry, the number of cryptocurrency investors in
-
Global Trading Volume of Stable Currency USDC Reaches $26.73 Billion within 24 Hours
It is reported that according to statistics, the stable currency USDC recorded a global trading volume of US $26.73 billion within 24 hours. On Saturday, the USDC decoupled from the US dollar and fell to a low of US $0.877. Therefore, encryption companies such as Binance, Coinbase, Crypto.com and Bitpay suspended USDC payment and automatic conversion. The stable currency USDC recorded a global trading volume of US $26.73 billion within 24 hours Analysis based on this information:The report reveals that the stable currency USDC has witnessed a surge in its global trading volume, reaching a whopping $26.73 billion within just 24 hours. This is a significant milestone for the digital payment industry, which has been experiencing rapid growth and adoption in recent years. However, amidst all this success, the USDC decoupled from the US dollar and dropped to a low of $0.877 on Saturday. This sudden drop in price has affected the operations of various encryption companies such as Binance,…
-
The Importance of Improving Regulatory Mechanisms in Digital Finance
According to reports, Vice President Xuan Changneng of the People\’s Bank of China stated at the \”Financial Infrastructure and Financial Services in the Digital Era\” roundtable at t
-
Ledger Launches Browser Plug-in for Secure Interaction with DApps
It is reported that Hardware Wallet Ledger has launched a browser plug-in that aims to provide a similar experience to encrypted wallets such as MetaMask. Ledger stated that it is not a hot wallet, but a cold wallet that allows users to interact directly using DApp via Bluetooth. In addition, it has two functions to ensure the security of users when interacting with encrypted applications: analyzing smart contracts and warning users if the transaction may be malicious, and simulating the transaction to show how it will affect the wallet. Ledger Launches Browser Plugins to Support Direct User Interaction Analysis based on this information:Hardware wallet provider Ledger has released a new browser plug-in that caters to users looking for secure interaction with decentralized applications (DApps). The Ledger plug-in has features that replicate those of encrypted wallets such as MetaMask, and it allows users to connect their cold wallets to DApps via Bluetooth. It is worth noting that Ledger’s plug-in is not…
-
What does decentralization of smart contracts mean (smart contract approval)
What does decentralization of smart contracts mean? In the blockchain field, the so-called “smart contract” refers to a set of smart contract systems created, issued and managed in the form of Computer code. Among them, the term “smart contract” is a numerical representation representing the ownership of a specific type of asset, and this entity does not have control power related to it. That is to say, the term ‘smart contract’ can be used as the basis for various virtual goods or services, such as real estate or items in games However, due to its non tampering nature, its uncertainty and volatility risk have also become a problem. Because the smart contract itself is not entirely owned and operated by a single person, it is not manipulated by a third party; On the other hand, the developers of the protocol have no responsibility in determining which tokens can be used for payment and how the trading platform handles these tokens…
-
ZkSync: The account was hacked due to Twitter not following standard procedures and approving the request of the impersonator to change the password
On April 16th, zkSync released a detailed report on Twitter account theft, stating that \”the impersonator forged their identity and claimed to be the official representative of zkS
-
dYdX Community Reduces Transaction Reward by 45% in Governance Vote
It is reported that the dYdX community has reduced the transaction reward by 45% of the governance vote (from 2876712 DYDXs to 1582192 DYDXs, and the rest will be accumulated), of which more than 25 million votes were in favor of the vote and 5 million votes were against it, aiming to increase the number of Token in the agreement reward treasury. DYdX community has passed the governance vote of reducing transaction rewards by 45% Analysis based on this information:The dYdX community has made an important decision regarding the transaction reward in a recent governance vote. The vote saw the majority of the over 30 million votes cast, with more than 25 million in favor of the decision, which will see a 45% reduction in the reward for transactions on the platform. This translates to a decrease from 2,876,712 DYDX tokens to 1,582,192 DYDX tokens, with the remaining amount being accumulated. The primary aim of this community-driven decision is to…
-
Cryptocurrency Exchange Freezes Funds Related to HarmonyBridge Theft and Suspected North Korean Hackers
On February 15, the blockchain analysis company Elliptic said that the cryptocurrency exchange, MoneyBridge and Huobi, on Tuesday frozen the cryptocurrency wor…
-
The State of the A-Share Market and Its Impact on the Blockchain and Digital Currency Sectors
According to news, the A-share market closed at 3315.36 points on the Shanghai Composite Index, which fell 0.37%. The Shenzhen Composite Index closed at 11871.93 points, which fell