Polkadot Committee Passes Proposal to Correct Substrate Errors and Reset Watr Parallel Chain Creation Block

On April 27th, the Polkadot Committee passed Proposal No. 393 to fix the incorrect referendum caused by Substrate errors and correctly reset the Watr parallel chain creation block.

Polkadot Committee Passes Proposal to Correct Substrate Errors and Reset Watr Parallel Chain Creation Block

On April 27th, the Polkadot Committee passed Proposal No. 393 to fix the incorrect referendum caused by Substrate errors and correctly reset the Watr parallel chain creation block.

Polkadot Proposal 393 will fix incorrect referendums caused by Substrate errors

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the recent decision made by the Polkadot Committee to rectify the issue caused by Substrate errors, which led to an incorrect referendum and the creation of a block that needs resetting. In this article, we will discuss the details of Proposal No. 393 and its implications for the Polkadot network.

Introduction

Polkadot is a multi-chain network that allows various blockchains to connect, interact, and share data in a secure and decentralized manner. It is built on Substrate, a modular framework that enables developers to customize and launch their own blockchain projects. However, during the recent referendum, a Substrate error caused an incorrect outcome, leading to the creation of a block that needs resetting.

The Problem

The referendum in question was launched in order to reduce the minimum staking threshold required for nominators on Polkadot. However, due to a bug in the Substrate code, the referendum was not processed correctly, resulting in an unexpected outcome. This invalidated the vote and created a block that needed resetting. This issue was identified and reported by the Polkadot community, and a fix was proposed.

Proposal No. 393

Proposal No. 393 was put forward to fix the problem caused by the Substrate error and correctly reset the Watr parallel chain creation block. This proposal called for the implementation of changes in the Polkadot codebase that would address the issue and prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
The proposal, which was submitted by the Polkadot Committee, was passed on April 27th by an overwhelming majority of stakeholders. The decision was based on the understanding that it was necessary for the integrity and trustworthiness of the network.

Implications for Stakeholders

The passing of Proposal No. 393 has important implications for Polkadot stakeholders, including validators, nominators, and users of the network. Firstly, it ensures that the network remains secure and reliable by fixing the mistake caused by the Substrate error. Additionally, it demonstrates the commitment of the Polkadot Committee to transparency and accountability, as the issue was identified and addressed promptly.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the passing of Proposal No. 393 by the Polkadot Committee is a significant development for the network and its stakeholders. It is an important step towards maintaining the network’s integrity and ensuring the responsiveness of the community to identified issues. The Polkadot Committee’s commitment to transparency and accountability is evident in their quick response to the Substrate error and their proposed fix.

FAQ

1. What was the exact Substrate error that led to the incorrect outcome in the referendum?
– The exact details of the Substrate error have not been disclosed, but it is believed to have been a bug in the code that affected the vote count.
2. How will the implementation of Proposal No. 393 affect the stability of the Polkadot network?
– The implementation of the proposal is expected to have a positive impact on the stability of the network by preventing similar errors from occurring in the future.
3. How does the Polkadot Committee plan to prevent similar issues in the future?
– The Polkadot Committee is committed to continuous improvement, and they plan to conduct regular audits of the network’s codebase to identify and address potential issues proactively.
#

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent qiAiAi's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.qiaiai.com/crypto/18677.html

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.