US Bankruptcy Judge Orders Silvergate Bank to Return $9.85 Million to Cryptographic Lending Institution

It is reported that according to a court document on Friday, Michael B. Kaplan, a US bankruptcy judge, said that Silvergate Bank must return US $9.85 million t…

US Bankruptcy Judge Orders Silvergate Bank to Return $9.85 Million to Cryptographic Lending Institution

It is reported that according to a court document on Friday, Michael B. Kaplan, a US bankruptcy judge, said that Silvergate Bank must return US $9.85 million to BlockFi, a cryptographic lending institution. BlockFi filed for bankruptcy protection in November 2022. Shortly after submitting the application, BlockFi began to negotiate with Silvergate to release its US $10 million deposited in the Silvergate reserve account. The two sides have reached an agreement on Friday, and Silvergate will return most of the funds within two working days. According to the previous news, Silvergate Capital Corporation said in the document submitted to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that the company may be “undercapitalized” and said that it was “re-evaluating its business”.

Silvergate Bank must return $9.85 million to BlockFi

Interpretation of the news:


According to recent reports, Michael B. Kaplan, a US bankruptcy judge, stated that Silvergate Bank must return $9.85 million to cryptographic lending institution, BlockFi. This decision came after BlockFi filed for bankruptcy protection in November 2022. Since submitting their application, BlockFi began negotiating with Silvergate to release their $10 million plan deposited in a reserve account. Recently, the two parties have come to a consensus, and Silvergate will return the majority of the funds within two business days.

It’s important to note that Silvergate Capital Corp, the parent company of Silvergate Bank, disclosed in filings submitted to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that the corporation could potentially be “undercapitalized” and was “re-evaluating its business.” This recent development has raised questions of whether or not Silvergate Bank is facing financial difficulties.

One explanation for the decision to return the funds could be that they were preserving their reputation within their industry. Cryptographic lending institutions rely heavily on deposits to operate, so financial missteps such as the one with BlockFi could cause negative repercussions for Silvergate Bank in the long run. It’s also possible that they wanted to avoid potential legal consequences, given the sensitive nature of the dealings between banks and cryptographic lending institutions.

This decision by the US bankruptcy judge is significant for those monitoring the growth of the cryptographic lending industry. It’s a testament to the legitimacy of these businesses that they have the same legal protections as any other industry, despite facing some unique challenges. It’s also a reminder that banks and other financial institutions must keep a watchful eye on their dealings with cryptographic lending companies in order to avoid legal action.

In summary, the decision of Michael B. Kaplan to order Silvergate Bank to return $9.85 million to BlockFi, a cryptographic lending institution, highlights some of the risks and challenges facing this emerging industry. Silvergate Bank’s situation also underscores the importance of keeping a close eye on the financial dealings of institutions like blockchains and cryptographic lending.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent qiAiAi's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.qiaiai.com/crypto/4967.html

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.