The Failure of Digital Assets to Live up to Their Initial Commitments
According to reports, a new report from the White House has criticized digital assets for failing to fulfill their initial commitments and posing risks to consumers and the entire
According to reports, a new report from the White House has criticized digital assets for failing to fulfill their initial commitments and posing risks to consumers and the entire US financial system. The report points out that digital assets have been touted as distribution tools for intellectual property and financial value, better payment mechanisms, ways to increase financial inclusion, and ways to cut off financial intermediaries, “So far, crypto assets have not brought any benefits. So far, crypto assets do not appear to provide any fundamental value for investment, nor can they serve as an effective substitute for fiat money, improve financial inclusion, or improve payment efficiency. Instead, their innovation is primarily to create artificial scarcity to support the price of crypto assets – many of which have no fundamental value, which has triggered regulatory efforts to protect consumers “Investors and other financial systems are protected from the effects of panic, collapse, and fraud associated with crypto assets.”
The White House attacks digital assets in a new report, arguing that cryptocurrency is not worth much
Digital assets have been touted as the future of finance, offering faster payments, better security, and greater accessibility. Cryptocurrencies and other digital assets have seen a massive surge in popularity over the past decade, with many investors and consumers turning to these assets as a means of investment, payment, and storage of value.
However, according to a new report from the White House, digital assets have failed to fulfill their initial commitments and have instead posed significant risks to consumers and the financial system as a whole.
The Failure of Digital Assets to Provide Benefits
The report points out that while digital assets have been promoted as a tool for distribution, payment, and financial inclusion, they have failed to deliver on any of these promises. Instead, the report argues, digital assets have primarily been used to create artificial scarcity and support inflated prices.
“So far, crypto assets do not appear to provide any fundamental value for investment, nor can they serve as an effective substitute for fiat money, improve financial inclusion, or improve payment efficiency,” the report states.
The Risks Posed by Digital Assets
The report also highlights the significant risks posed by digital assets, including the potential for money laundering, terrorist financing, and other forms of criminal activity. Digital assets are also highly volatile, with prices fluctuating wildly due to market speculation and manipulation.
“Instead, their innovation is primarily to create artificial scarcity to support the price of crypto assets – many of which have no fundamental value, which has triggered regulatory efforts to protect consumers,” the report says.
Regulatory Efforts to Protect Consumers
The report notes that regulatory bodies in the US and around the world are taking steps to protect consumers and the financial system from these risks. The SEC and other agencies have launched investigations into numerous digital asset offerings and are taking a more active role in monitoring the digital asset market.
“Regulatory efforts are necessary to protect investors and other financial systems from the effects of panic, collapse, and fraud associated with crypto assets,” the report argues.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the White House report highlights the failure of digital assets to deliver on their initial promises and the risks they pose to consumers and the financial system. While cryptocurrencies and other digital assets have seen a surge in popularity in recent years, investors and consumers must be aware of the potential risks and limitations of these assets.
FAQs:
1. Can digital assets be used for investment?
While digital assets may have potential as an investment, the report argues that they have not yet provided any fundamental value for investment.
2. How are regulatory bodies responding to the risks posed by digital assets?
Regulatory bodies are taking a more active role in monitoring the digital asset market, investigating numerous offerings, and taking steps to protect consumers and financial systems.
3. What risks do digital assets pose to the financial system?
Digital assets pose risks related to money laundering, terrorist financing, volatility, market manipulation, fraud, and more.
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent qiAiAi's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.qiaiai.com/metaverse/10168.html
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.
Related recommendations
-
Reserve Bank of Australia selects 14 digital currency proposals for pilot study
According to reports, the Reserve Bank of Australia said that it had selected 14 digital currency proposal use cases from a large number of submissions submitt…
-
Table of Contents
On April 5th, Avalanche announced that SK Planet, a South Korean data and technology company, is building an Avalanche subnet for its tens of millions of users. Their subnet UPTN w
-
Hong Kong Web3 Association Opens Membership Applications
On April 11th, according to the official website of the Hong Kong Web3 Association, membership applications have been opened for the Association, which can be divided into senior m
-
Binance’s SAFU Fund Ensures User Protection against Market Decline
On March 17th, Binance announced that it had converted the BUSD held in the User Security Asset Fund (SAFU) into TUSD and USDT to ensure long-term protection of users in the event of a continuous decline in the BUSD market. Binance stated that SAFU funds will be closely monitored to ensure their capital adequacy, and when necessary, use Binance’s own funds to regularly replenish funds. Coin An converts the BUSD in the SAFU fund into TUSD and USDT Analysis based on this information:Binance, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, has recently converted the BUSD held in its User Security Asset Fund (SAFU) into TUSD and USDT. This move was made to ensure long-term protection of users in case of a continuous decline in the BUSD market. Binance’s statement clarifies that SAFU funds will be closely monitored to ensure their capital adequacy, and when needed, the company will use its own funds to replenish them regularly. The SAFU fund is…
-
Getty Images Teams Up with Candy Digital to Sell Rare Photos as NFTs
It is reported that the photography giant Getty Images announced that it would cooperate with the NFT platform Candy Digital to sell rare photos in the form of…
-
Monad Labs secures US $19 million in seed round financing
It is reported that Monad Labs, an EVM-compatible blockchain project founded by Keone Hon, the former research director of Jump Trading, completed a seed round…
-
NYDFS denies takeover of Signature Bank is related to its cryptocurrency operations
According to reports, a spokesman for the New York Financial Services Department (NYDFS) said that the decision to take over Signature Bank on Sunday had nothing to do with the bank’s cryptocurrency business. Previously, Barney Frank, a former US congressman, criticized the decision of the regulators, claiming that they “wanted to transmit harmful information about cryptocurrency”. A spokesman for NYDFS said in a statement that the decision to take over the bank and hand it over to FDIC was based on the current situation of the bank and its ability to conduct business in a safe and healthy manner. The spokesman said that they were working with senior executives of Signature Bank to assess its financial status, ability to meet withdrawal requests and whether it could continue to operate normally. The bank did not provide “reliable and consistent data, resulting in a serious crisis of trust in the bank’s leadership”. NYDFS said that Signature is a bank with more important…
-
LayerSwap’s Immovable Core SDK: The Future of Cross-chain Transfer
On February 16, the Layer2 cross-chain transfer project LayerSwap launched the Immovable Core SDK, which supports users to send ETH, IMX, and USDC to the Immov…
-
NFTs and Wakwelli: a new era of authentication on Polygon
According to reports, the NFT authentication protocol Wakwelli announced that it had signed a cooperation agreement with Polygon to ensure that all digital assets on the network we
-
The Impact of the KPMG Lawsuit on the Silicon Valley Bank
On April 9th, it was reported that KPMG, responsible for providing audit services to Silicon Valley Bank, as well as underwriters of stocks or bonds of Silicon Valley banks such as