NYDFS Head: “Choke Point 2.0” Not the Reason Behind Signature Bank’s Acquisition
According to reports, Adrianne Harris, head of the New York Financial Services Department (NYDFS), stated that Signature Bank\’s acquisition last month was not part of any so-called
According to reports, Adrianne Harris, head of the New York Financial Services Department (NYDFS), stated that Signature Bank’s acquisition last month was not part of any so-called Choke Point 2.0. She called the idea absurd and ridiculous, and the decision to intervene and close Signature had nothing to do with cryptocurrency. The idea of regulators attempting to debank cryptocurrency was foolish.
NYDFS Director: The idea of regulatory agencies attempting to debank cryptocurrencies is foolish
The New York Financial Services Department has recently clarified that the acquisition of Signature Bank was not part of any “Choke Point 2.0.” This news comes after weeks of speculation and concern that regulatory bodies were attempting to “debank” cryptocurrency businesses. In this article, we will explore the controversy surrounding the alleged “Choke Point 2.0” and the NYDFS’s response to it.
The Background of Choke Point 2.0
“Choke Point 2.0” is a term coined by some members of the cryptocurrency community to describe a recent trend of regulatory intervention in the banking industry. The original “Choke Point” initiative was launched in 2013 by the Obama administration to combat fraudulent practices in sectors deemed high-risk, such as payday loans and telemarketing.
In the years that followed, the program was criticized for its overreach and its propensity to target legitimate businesses operating in high-risk sectors. The backlash eventually led to the program’s dissolution in 2017.
Recently, some members of the cryptocurrency community have grown concerned that regulatory bodies are attempting to revive “Choke Point” tactics to crack down on cryptocurrency businesses. Signature Bank’s acquisition was seen by some as evidence of this trend.
The Clarification from the NYDFS
Adrianne Harris, the head of the NYDFS, has come out to deny these allegations. She stated that the decision to intervene in Signature Bank’s acquisition had nothing to do with cryptocurrency and that the idea of regulators attempting to debank cryptocurrency was “foolish.”
Harris went on to call the idea of “Choke Point 2.0” absurd and ridiculous, stating that the NYDFS was committed to fostering innovation in the financial services industry.
The Implications of the NYDFS’s Response
The NYDFS’s clarification is good news for the cryptocurrency industry, as it suggests that regulatory bodies are not taking an adversarial stance towards crypto businesses. However, it remains to be seen whether other regulatory bodies will follow the NYDFS’s lead and reassure the industry that they are not attempting to “debank” crypto businesses.
It’s also worth noting that while the NYDFS’s actions may not have been motivated by a desire to crack down on crypto businesses, the incident does highlight the difficulty that some crypto startups have in finding banking partners.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the idea of “Choke Point 2.0” has been debunked by the head of the NYDFS. The controversy surrounding Signature Bank’s acquisition was not related to cryptocurrency, and the NYDFS is committed to fostering innovation in the financial services industry. While this clarification is good news for the industry, it remains to be seen whether other regulatory bodies will follow suit and reassure businesses that they are not attempting to “debank” them.
FAQs
Q: What is “Choke Point 2.0”?
A: “Choke Point 2.0” is a term coined by some members of the cryptocurrency community to describe a recent trend of regulatory intervention in the banking industry.
Q: Was Signature Bank’s acquisition related to cryptocurrency?
A: According to the head of the NYDFS, Adrianne Harris, the decision to intervene in Signature Bank’s acquisition had nothing to do with cryptocurrency.
Q: Are regulatory bodies attempting to “debank” cryptocurrency businesses?
A: According to Harris, the idea of regulatory bodies attempting to debank cryptocurrency businesses is “foolish.”
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent qiAiAi's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.qiaiai.com/metaverse/13543.html
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.
Related recommendations
-
FARE Protocol Raises $6.2 Million in Financing Round
According to reports, FARE Protocol announced the completion of a $6.2 million financing, led by Goat Capital and C Squared Ventures. 6th Man Ventures, Republic Crypto, Arrington C
-
Layer1 Public Chain Sei Announces Establishment of Sei Foundation
According to reports, the Layer1 public chain Sei has announced the establishment of the Sei Foundation, a non-profit organization that supports the Sei ecosystem to fund the devel
-
#OUTLINE
It is reported that on March 24th, the difficulty of Bitcoin increased by 7.56% to 46.84T, setting a new record. On March 23rd (UTC), Bitcoin\’s computing power hit a record high, o
-
CCP Games Secures $40 Million Financing Led by a16z
It is reported that the chain game developer CCP Games has completed a financing of $40 million, with a16z leading the investment, and Makers Fund, Bitkraft, Kingsway Capital, Nexo
-
Beosin EagleEye Reports Blockchain Security Attack Resulting in Loss of $500000
According to reports, according to the security risk monitoring of Beosin EagleEye, a blockchain security audit company owned by Beosin, the LockedDeal contract of ETH, BSC, and Poolz Finance on the Polygon chain was attacked, resulting in a loss of approximately $500000. An attacker called the vulnerable function CreateMassPools in the LockedDeal contract, and the_ A vulnerability in StartAmount triggers an integer overflow. In addition to obtaining a large number of poolz tokens, the attacker also obtained other tokens. Please raise the alert for related projects. Previously, Beosin EagleEye monitored a 90% drop in Poolz Finance related token $POOLZ Poolz Finance’s Locked Deal contract was attacked and lost approximately $500000 Analysis based on this information:According to reports from Beosin EagleEye, a blockchain security audit company owned by Beosin, there has been an attack on the LockedDeal contract of various tokens on the Polygon chain such as ETH, BSC, and Poolz Finance. The attack has resulted in a loss of approximately…
-
Ethereum Goerli Test Network Activates Shapella Upgrade
It is reported that the Ethereum Goerli test network activated the Shapella upgrade at 6:26 on March 15. When the block was triggered, the verification node participation rate was 29%, which was low for Ethereum. In the YouTube live broadcast, Ben Edgington, the product leader of Teku, an Ethereum customer, admitted that the low participation rate might be due to the failure of the verification node to upgrade to the Goerli bifurcation in time. Ethereum Goerli test network activates Shapella upgrade, and the participation rate of verification nodes is 29% Analysis based on this information:The Ethereum Goerli test network has activated the Shapella upgrade on March 15th. However, during the activation, the verification node participation rate only reached 29%, which is considered low for Ethereum. Ben Edgington, the product leader of Teku, an Ethereum customer, acknowledged in a YouTube live broadcast that the low participation rate might be due to the failure of verification nodes to upgrade to the Goerli…
-
Binance’s Commitment to Cryptocurrency Wallets
On February 14, CZ said in a speech on Binance\’s official Twitter Space that Binance invests in all aspects of the encrypted wallet. The wallet ecosystem is ve…
-
GCR Trader and the Recent Decoupling of USDC
On March 12, it was reported that the monitoring data of Lookonchain showed that during the recent decoupling of the USDC, the operation of the “smart trader” GCR was as follows: During USDC decoupling, the trader GCR changes USDT into USDC on DEX, deposits it in OKX and uses USDT to buy ETH Analysis based on this information:The message from March 12th discusses how the monitoring data of Lookonchain revealed the operation of a “smart trader” known as GCR during the recent decoupling of USDC. This news is incredibly significant for those who are following the cryptocurrency market as it provides valuable insights into how certain traders operate and what strategies they use to maximize their profits. To fully understand the implications of this message, it is necessary to define some of the key terms. Lookonchain is a blockchain analytics firm that provides real-time data insights for a variety of cryptocurrencies. The smart trader, GCR, is an individual or group…
-
Establishing a Unified Cross Chain Security Model for Interoperability
On April 15, it was reported that in the 2023 Hong Kong Web3 Carnival Cross chain Special Session, Luke Liu, the core contributor of Poly Network ecology, believed that the establi
-
Seven Seven Six’s Cryptocurrency Fund: A Tale of Wrong Timing
On February 22, Alexis Ohanian, co-founder of Reddit and leader of Seven Seven Six, said in an interview with Forbes that after obtaining the RIA license in 20…