Dedaub’s Proposal to Use Verkle Tree for Ethereum’s Security

It is reported that the security company Dedaub sent a message on social media suggesting that Ethereum should use the more advantageous Verkle tree to reduce …

Dedaubs Proposal to Use Verkle Tree for Ethereums Security

It is reported that the security company Dedaub sent a message on social media suggesting that Ethereum should use the more advantageous Verkle tree to reduce the gas cost. Unlike Merkle-Patricia, Verkle tree can enable encrypted secure light clients and can support “state witness” to minimize data transmission. If the state access cost is fully measured and corresponds to the size of “state witness”, the stateless client network will not be attacked by DoS. In this regard, Curve Finance, the DeFi protocol, believes that the proposal is “absolutely harmful” and will “kill DeFi on the main network”, and expresses the hope of further communication to explore other solutions.

The security company Dedaub proposed to use Verkle tree to reduce gas costs, which was opposed by Curve Finance

Interpretation of the news:


Dedaub is a security company that has suggested Ethereum use the Verkle tree instead of the Merkle-Patricia tree to reduce the gas cost. Verkle tree is capable of enabling encrypted secure light clients and can support a “state witness” mechanism to minimize data transmission. The state access cost, which corresponds to the size of the state witness, is measured for the stateless client network to prevent it from being attacked by DoS. However, Curve Finance, a prominent DeFi protocol, believes the proposal to be “absolutely harmful” and that it will “kill DeFi on the main network.”

To better understand the proposal, it is essential to comprehend the concept of gas cost. Ethereum calculates transaction fees by measuring the amount of computational power required for the network to process the transaction. This computational power is called gas, and it is purchased by users in small denominations of ETH. Different types of transactions require different amounts of gas. Therefore, reducing gas costs is always a top priority for Ethereum.

Merkle-Patricia is the current data storage structure used by Ethereum. However, the Verkle tree is a more efficient data storage structure as it reduces storage costs while increasing security. Additionally, the Verkle tree can adequately support state witnesses, which are used to prove the current state of an Ethereum smart contract. Thus, using Verkle tree could help reduce the cost of state access, which is essential for the efficient operation of Ethereum.

Despite its benefits, Curve Finance believes that using Verkle tree would be detrimental to DeFi on the main network. The reason for this is that Verkle tree is relatively new and untested. Any errors could result in significant losses for users, which is not acceptable in the DeFi world. Consequently, Curve Finance urges further communication to explore alternative solutions that can maintain Ethereum’s security while minimizing costs.

In conclusion, Dedaub’s proposal to use Verkle tree is a viable solution to reduce Ethereum’s gas costs. However, Curve Finance’s warning that it could “kill DeFi on the main network” highlights the potential risks of the change. While the use of Verkle tree can enhance Ethereum’s security and reduce cost, any mistakes could lead to severe repercussions on the DeFi network.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent qiAiAi's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.qiaiai.com/metaverse/3457.html

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.