The Limitations of Cryptocurrency Regulation

According to reports, Jake Chervinsky, the policy director of the American non-profit organization Blockchain Association, said on social media on Tuesday that…

The Limitations of Cryptocurrency Regulation

According to reports, Jake Chervinsky, the policy director of the American non-profit organization Blockchain Association, said on social media on Tuesday that neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has the authority to comprehensively regulate cryptocurrencies. Chervinsky said that 2022 was the worst year in the history of cryptocurrency, because the collapse of FTX.com, a cryptocurrency exchange headquartered in the Bahamas, had caused great damage to the reputation of the industry and led skeptics to rush to supervise. The ideological differences between Republicans and Democrats in the House of Representatives delayed the debate on the regulation of digital assets, which led agencies to expand their powers beyond recognition in order to complete their work without Congress, whether or not permitted by law.

Policy director of the Blockchain Association: neither the SEC nor the CFTC has the right to comprehensively supervise cryptocurrency

Interpretation of the news:


The message highlights the limitations surrounding cryptocurrency regulation from the perspective of Jake Chervinsky, the policy director of Blockchain Association. According to Chervinsky, neither the Securities and Exchanges Commission nor the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has the power to regulate cryptocurrencies comprehensively. This implies that the cryptocurrency industry is operating in a gray area without adequate regulatory oversight.

Furthermore, Chervinsky argues that the year 2022 was the worst in the history of cryptocurrency due to the collapse of FTX.com, a cryptocurrency exchange based in the Bahamas. He notes that the collapse caused significant damage to the industry’s reputation and triggered skepticism that led to pressure for more regulation. This situation underscores the need for effective and comprehensive regulation of the cryptocurrency industry.

However, the message also highlights the ideological differences between Democrats and Republicans in the House of Representatives as a potential obstacle to comprehensive regulation of digital assets. The delay in debating the regulation of digital assets has led agencies to expand their powers beyond recognition to complete their work without the involvement of Congress, regardless of whether such actions are permitted by law.

The message highlights the challenges inherent in regulating cryptocurrencies and the need for regulatory clarity to prevent scams and protect investors. The absence of robust regulatory oversight represents a significant risk to the integrity and sustainability of the cryptocurrency industry. It is crucial for policymakers to work together to overcome ideological differences and establish a clear framework for regulating cryptocurrencies.

In summary, the message reflects the challenges facing regulators in the cryptocurrency industry, including the limitations of regulatory oversight, ideological differences, and the risk of scams. While cryptocurrency offers significant potential for innovation and economic growth, policymakers must find a way to protect investors and safeguard the integrity of the industry through well-crafted regulations. The three keywords that capture the essence of the message are regulation, reputation, and authority.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent qiAiAi's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.qiaiai.com/metaverse/597.html

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.