FTX creditors have recovered over $1.4 billion in digital assets, and another $1.7 billion is currently being recovered

On April 10th, according to a report released by FTX creditors, on July 31, 2019, former FTX engineering director Nishad Singh changed the code base to allow Alameda to extract an unlimited amount of encrypted assets from FTX; A week later, it was modified to exempt Alameda from automatic liquidation, and FTX Group kept almost all encrypted assets in a hot wallet (SBF falsely claimed to use a cold wallet).

FTX creditors have recovered over $1.4 billion in digital assets, and another $1.7 billion is currently being recovered

Introduction

– Brief overview of the FTX report and its significance
– Explanation of Alameda’s involvement in FTX

Nishad Singh’s Code Change

– Description of Nishad Singh’s role as engineering director at FTX
– Explanation of the code change that allowed Alameda to extract unlimited assets from FTX
– Analysis of the potential impact of this code change on FTX’s asset security

Exemption from Automatic Liquidation

– Discussion of the modification to exempt Alameda from automatic liquidation
– Explanation of the ramifications of this modification for FTX users
– Examination of the ethics of this modification and its potential impact on FTX’s reputation

FTX’s Hot Wallet Usage

– Overview of SBF’s claims regarding the use of a cold wallet
– Discussion of the report’s findings regarding the use of a hot wallet by FTX Group
– Critical analysis of the security risks associated with storing encrypted assets in a hot wallet

Conclusion

– Summary of the main points of the article
– Evaluation of the potential impact of this report on the future of FTX and its users
# On April 10th, a report released by FTX creditors revealed that on July 31, 2019, former FTX engineering director Nishad Singh changed the code base to allow Alameda to extract an unlimited amount of encrypted assets from FTX. A week later, it was modified to exempt Alameda from automatic liquidation, and FTX Group kept almost all encrypted assets in a hot wallet. SBF falsely claimed to use a cold wallet.

Introduction

FTX, a cryptocurrency exchange, has recently come under scrutiny following the release of a report by its creditors. The report details alleged misconduct on the part of FTX Group and its employees, particularly former engineering director Nishad Singh and Alameda, a digital assets trading firm. The report’s findings have serious implications for the security of FTX users’ assets, as well as the reputation of the exchange itself.

Nishad Singh’s Code Change

According to the report, Nishad Singh changed the code base of FTX on July 31, 2019, in a way that allowed Alameda to extract an unlimited amount of encrypted assets from the exchange. This code change is particularly concerning given Singh’s position as engineering director, as it implies that he had the authority and access necessary to potentially compromise FTX’s asset security.
Furthermore, the report suggests that this code change was not the result of an error or oversight, but rather a deliberate act of misconduct. If this is true, it raises serious questions about the integrity of FTX Group’s leadership and its commitment to the security of its users’ assets.

Exemption from Automatic Liquidation

In addition to the code change, the report also outlines a modification that exempted Alameda from automatic liquidation. This means that while other FTX users may have had their assets automatically liquidated based on certain criteria, Alameda was granted an exemption from this policy.
This modification is troubling for a number of reasons. Firstly, it suggests that FTX Group was willing to bend its own rules and policies in order to benefit Alameda. Secondly, it puts other FTX users at a disadvantage, as they were not afforded the same privilege as Alameda. Finally, it raises ethical questions about the relationship between FTX Group and Alameda, particularly if there was any financial incentive involved in granting this exemption.

FTX’s Hot Wallet Usage

Finally, the report reveals that FTX Group kept almost all of its encrypted assets in a hot wallet, despite claims by SBF that a cold wallet was being used. A hot wallet is a type of digital wallet that is connected to the internet, making it more vulnerable to hacking and other security risks.
This finding is particularly concerning given the other alleged misconduct outlined in the report. If FTX Group was willing to make modifications that benefitted Alameda at the potential expense of its other users, it suggests a lack of commitment to asset security more broadly. Furthermore, the use of a hot wallet raises serious questions about FTX Group’s ability to protect its users’ assets from potential cyber attacks or other security breaches.

Conclusion

The FTX report paints a troubling picture of potential misconduct on the part of FTX Group and its employees. From Nishad Singh’s alleged code change to Alameda’s exemption from automatic liquidation to the use of a hot wallet, there are a number of red flags that should concern FTX users and potential investors. While it remains to be seen what, if any, consequences will result from this report, it is clear that the issues raised must be taken seriously if FTX hopes to maintain the trust of its users and the wider cryptocurrency community.
# FAQs

Q: What is FTX?

A: FTX is a cryptocurrency exchange, allowing users to trade a variety of digital assets.

Q: What is a hot wallet?

A: A hot wallet is a type of digital wallet that is connected to the internet, making it more vulnerable to hacking and other security risks.

Q: What is the significance of the FTX report’s findings?

A: The report’s findings suggest potential misconduct on the part of FTX Group and its employees, particularly with regards to asset security. This raises serious questions about the exchange’s reputation and its ability to protect its users’ assets.
#